February 28, 2015

A Chronology of the UN - The Revolutionary Steps to Global Tyranny and the radical minds behind the New World Order

The Great Seal: Novus Ordo Seclorum (New Order of the Ages)

A Chronology of the UN

The Revolutionary Steps to Global Tyranny
and the radical minds behind the New World Order


Skip down to CFR | Alger Hiss | Ruskin | Kissinger | Quigley | Conspiracy |
Council of Churches| Tragedy and Hope | Cecil Rhodes | RIIA
The banners above the eagle wings states:
 'E Pluribus Unum' ('One out of many') - the masonic vision of one controlled world & spirituality.

Please remember that our God Reigns -- no matter what happens

"Locksley Hall" by Alfred Lord Tennyson, 1842
For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see,
Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be...
Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and the battle-flags were furl'd
In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world.
There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe,
And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law.



The roots of the United Nations -- the most visible part of the new global management system -- might be compared to the many deep and spreading roots of a tenacious vine. Some of the roots are short and shallow. Others are long and deep, firmly imbedded in powerful social, political and financial institutions in Europe and North America, which -- for various reasons -- shared Lord Tennyson's vision of a "federation of the world."  

The tangled roots of this vine spread beneath the surface of public life until 1945, when delegates from 50 countries met in San Francisco to sign the UN Charter. Communist spy, Alger Hiss, co-authored that founding charter and served as the first acting UN Secretary-General. This initial glimpse of the global agenda should have raised a big red flag. But our war-torn world was already blinded by the well-publicized vision of a peaceable planet "lapt in universal law." Who dared oppose such a noble purpose?

February 22, 2015

Munich Speech: Looking at Europe from Prague Which Recently Celebrated the 25th Anniversary of the Fall of Communism


Thank you for inviting me to come to Munich after a relatively long time and for giving me an opportunity to speak here tonight. Last time I made a speech in this city was in May 2009 in the moment of the culmination of my fight with the Lisbon Treaty, which I considered then and consider now – with the benefit of hindsight – an important component in a series of wrong steps towards economically unproductive and politically undemocratic European arrangements. My last speech at the invitation of Prof. Sinn was held at the University of Munich in June 2004 and its title was “Die Implikationen der diesjährigen Erweiterung der Europäischen Union”. When I look at it now, it seems almost pre-history.

This time, I came with a slightly different topic even though its substance is rather similar. Let me say a few words about Europe using two specific perspectives – looking at Europe and especially its current institutional form, the EU, from a relatively new EU member state, the Czech Republic (from “New Europe”, using Donald Rumsfeld´s infamous terminology), and looking at it from a country which recently celebrated the 25th anniversary of the fall of communism. I made many speeches about it all-over Europe last autumn. I will not repeat my main arguments connected with this anniversary here now but I want to say very clearly that despite all my criticism of some of its aspects, the post-communist transition in my country (and in some other Central and East European countries as well) was a success. And it was done without any external help, without fiscal transfers from anywhere.[1]

February 2, 2015

How the elite control us and what they will do when they lose control


groupthink2

In large part, the American people have been conquered through the principle of groupthink. Throughout history, groupthink has played a prominent role in coercing the public of any nation into going to war for the benefit of the elite ruling class and their financial bottom line.

Groupthink

 

groupthink

Groupthink is a term coined by social psychologist Irving Janis in 1972, and it occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment”.

Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups. A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink (e.g. Neocons and the Iraq War, radical Muslim elements within the government and the coming great American purge followed by WW III) when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making.

It is the premise of this article that groupthink is being used to “nudge” Americans into accepting a new paradigm which is suicidal for the country’s continued existence. 

The Meat and Potatoes of Groupthink

February 1, 2015

Putin Orders Special Forces To Protect Greek Leaders Life “At All Costs”


By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers


A stunning new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) states that President Putin has ordered an immediate deployment of at least 125 special forces operatives to Greece to “insure the protection of life at all costs” of that nations new Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras[Photo 2nd left]

According to this report, Prime Minister Tsipras took office this past week after his Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA) party won a “blowout” election victory sending shockwaves through the corridors of power in both the European Union and the United States.

Upon taking office, this report continues, Prime Minister Tsipras further “shocked and stunned” both the EU and US by holding his first official government meeting with Ambassador of Russia to Greece Andrey Maslov.

Compelling Prime Minister Tsipras to first meet with Ambassador Maslov, this report says, were fears that his life was in immediate danger from both the EU and US due to intelligence reports he’d received within hours of taking office provided to him by his own nations National Intelligence Service (EYP)
Though this MoFA report doesn’t say what the exact fears of Prime Minister Tsipras or the EYP, were, it does state that were of such a magnitude that Ambassador Maslov, acting on his own authority, ordered an immediate attachment of his own personal protection detail to that of the new Greek leader own security forces.

In addition to those special forces authorized by Ambassador Maslov to protect Prime Minister Tsipras, this report states, President Putin’s new order authorizes a further deployment to Greece of Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR RF) operatives and a contingent of specialists from the Psychological Security Department (PSD) of the Presidential Security Service (SBP).

Important to note, MoFA experts in this report say, is that the PSD is the intelligence branch of SBP that is responsible for analyzing information collected of the options about the lives risk of the President.