February 27, 2013

Obama Pushing Trans-Atlantic Union with EU

Even as the European Union continues to pursue ever-closer “integration” in the name of “global governance,” Obama is now working to form a “Trans-Atlantic partnership” between the U.S. government and the EU under the guise of a so-called “free trade” agreement. Formally announced in the United States during the president’s State of the Union address, the highly controversial deal — a scheme that has been under discussion since before the current administration came to power — is expected to take at least 18 months to complete. It also has the backing of both Big Business and Big Labor.

The “Transatlantic Partnership,” of course, is just one of the major sovereignty-threatening international schemes being pursued by the Obama administration simultaneously — closer North American integration and the so-called “Trans-Pacific Partnership” are two of the most prominent efforts. The latest plot, though, has far-reaching, global implications that critics argue represent a serious threat to America and freedom. If the U.S.-EU deal ends up becoming reality, the regulatory regime governing the new bloc, which accounts for about half of global GDP, would become the de-facto standard-setting entity for the entire planet.        

“To boost American exports, support American jobs and level the playing field in the growing markets of Asia, we intend to complete negotiations on a Trans-Pacific Partnership,” Obama said during his SOTU speech. “And tonight, I am announcing that we will launch talks on a comprehensive Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the European Union — because trade that is free and fair across the Atlantic supports millions of good-paying American jobs.”

Vice President Joe Biden, meanwhile, hinted at the plan even earlier, and since at least 2007, governments on both sides of the Atlantic have been formally working on the scheme. The New American magazine first warned of EU-U.S. integration in a 2009 in-depth cover story by author James Perloff, who concluded that the economic alliance would eventually and inevitably lead to a political merger.  

February 23, 2013

George Bush Could Have Been a ‘Great’ President, but…

Steve Cooper
The Conservative Monster
Bush should have arrested the Communist infiltrators within the Democrat Party that chose to side with Al Qaeda over the USA… but he chickened out. He knew exactly what they were up to, but he had limited executive powers to protect the Nation.
Bush would have went down as a great President if he smashed Iran into pieces rather than just surrounding them in Iraq and Afghanistan. GW was afraid to cross the red line that the Russians and China put down when it came to attacking ‘their’ terror proxy, Iran.
GW knew that the Democrats were on the side of the Muslim terrorists early in the game. Everyday, the media attacked the wars and the US Troops just to undermine Bush and the Republicans.
The media conveniently forgot that the Democrats voted for the Iraq war and they also pushed the WMD’s in Iraq ‘war dance’. The goal was to get boots on the ground in the Middle East and then undermine the war. This strategy failed in 2004 when Bush beat John ‘Lurch’ Kerry, but 2006 was a turning point when the Democrats took control of he Congress and the Senate. I warned everyone at that moment…it is game over. I saw this power grab coming from the Democrats way before any Tea Party rookies even knew what the White House was.

February 21, 2013



LONDON, 15th July 2008: It will be recalled that we have repeatedly stated that the overall crisis in the United States, a.k.a. part of 'the Main Enemy', is attributable to a long-range 'Black' offensive by foreign powers to destroy the United States. PERIOD.

We have consistently indicated that one of the foreign powers behind this operation is Germany, and that the engine of this massive intelligence operation is the covert Nazi Strategic Deception Continuum based at Dachau, near Munich, Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (or DVD), which has always operated 'independently' of the German Government, is self-financing like the CIA, and is believed to 'report' its activities to the German Chancellor, who is not in the habit, historically, of overruling its global subversive operations against Britain and the United States.

At the same time, the Editor has published the second work by Anatoliy Golitsyn, The Perestroika Deception, which exposed Soviet long-range deception strategy against the West and the United States. The Editor acquired the rights to this manuscript, as Editor inter alia of Soviet Analyst, after the US intelligence community had tried to suppress it; and Edward Harle Limited duly published a greatly expanded version with Golitsyn's approval in 1995.

FACT: At the strategic intelligence level, the covert Soviet Union and the covert Nazi Continuum work together, to this day. That these two powers work covertly together was explicitly revealed in the 'Madrid Circular Letter', a document captured by the Allies in the early 1950s en route from the Nazis' German Geopolitical Centre in Madrid, which was set up by the Abwehr in 1942 to plan for the post-war period and, if Germany was defeated, to develop a new methodology designed to reverse the outcomes of the defeats suffered by Germany in the First and Second World Wars.

This notorious document not only trumpeted the Nazi slogan 'Fur uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei' ('For us the war never ended'), which we have repeatedly cited, but also contained confirmations that Germany's alliance with the West was false, representing no more than a temporary expedient, and that Germany's permanent interests lie in the East:

The pretence of transnational politics and why national parliaments still rule

The home of European Democracy?
The most resolute defenders of the European parliament often argue that it is the home of ‘transnational democracy’ where MEPs look after the interests of European citizens. However, in Monday's debate on the EU budget deal – struck by national leaders – reactions of the leaders of the Parliament’s four largest political groups which we cited on our blogshowed just how far from reality this assertion is.

The leaders of the EPP, Socialists and Democrats, Liberals and Greens all attacked the compromise, and demanded renegotiation. They all claimed to speak on behalf of their factions but in reality these tend to be hugely fragmented along national lines, a handful of ‘true believers’ aside. For example, the views of Dutch, Swedish, Danish, British and German MEPs – whose national leaders backed cutting the budget – were barely reflected. Moreover, in the UK and Holland in particular, the need for restraint in the EU budget was an issue of cross party consensus, and not of ideological contention.

Consequently we were treated to the bizarre spectacle of Labour MEPs sitting behind S&D group chairman Hannes Swoboda as he lambasted the budget cut which Labour leader Ed Miliband had demanded. The same applies to Moderaterna MEPs listening to EPP group chairman Joseph Daul and VVD and Lib Dem MEPs listening to the BBC-favourite Guy Verhofstadt ("he's always available"). Meanwhile, Martin Callanan of the ECR group, composed mainly of MEPs from the Conservative party and Poland’s Law and Justice party,broadly welcomed the deal.

However, in a inverse version of the above phenomenon, a debate in the Polish parliament yesterday morning, the Law and Justice representative argued that the budget deal was bad for Poland, in particular the failure to obtain more funds for rural subsidies and to obtain parity in direct payments with the EU15 countries, citing the speech by Jospeh Daul in support of his argument – the same Daul accused by Callanan of “throwing a teenage tantrum”. Meanwhile, referring to the fiscal treaty, the same Law and Justice MP claimed it would "murder solidarity in Europe", a view ostensibly more suited to the socialist and far left than conservative groups.

Particularly when it comes down to the core issues in a democracy  - such as taxation and spending - it's still all about national politics, and securing the best possible deal for domestic constituents and trying to inflict damage on their domestic political opponents. A genuinely transnational politics in the EU is nowhere near to becoming a reality.


February 19, 2013

The Berlin Wall falling was clever communist deception

Steve Cooper
The Conservative Monster
The Berlin Wall falling was clever communist deception for the West to lower its guard. Vladimir Putin is not exactly Mr Rogers and Russia is needed to escort American astronauts into space. So, explain to me exactly how the USA won the Cold War? The Republicans and Democrats both keep repeating that lie.
The Republicans crediting Reagan with the defeat of Communism are no different than the Democrats patting Obama on the back for the Bin Laden raid. It is just empty propaganda being used for political gain.
It is interesting that the Soviet Union supposedly collapsed in 1991 and 2 years later the World Trade Center was attacked by a new enemy, Al Qaeda. Coincidence? No, there is no such thing as coincidences with terrorism. This was a great way for the Communists to divert attention towards a new enemy, Islam rather than the Soviet Union.

February 15, 2013

Chuck Hagel is a Mutiny in the Making ?

Steve Cooper
What better way to divide the US Military by putting in a man that spoke out against them during the Iraq War. Now you can understand why the Military suicide rate is going through the roof. Our Soldiers know their leaders that betrayed them during the Bush years are now in control of their lives.
Dividing the US Military is a great way to weaken them so the USA is vulnerable for an attack just like they were pre-9//11 from the Clinton budget cuts.
Several retired soldiers have come out against Hagel for his verbal attacks against the ‘Iraq surge’ that John McCain pushed for. Hagel is clearly pro-Iranian judging by his comments about Israel. I call Hagel, Ron Paul’s evil twin, because they both love Iran so much.
My theories and analysis are usually on the money and I believe that this is how it went down. This is my analysis on ‘the surge’:
The surge only worked, because there was a ‘behind the scene’ conversation between Bush and Putin. I believe that Bush warned Putin to get those Iranian animals in line that were killing US Troops or they will be bombed into the stone ages.
Putin made a trip to Iran in late 2007 and mysteriously the violence started to lessen about 4-6 weeks later in Iraq. Bush scared the Iranians and they told their Al Qaeda in Iraq pals to  end the bloodshed against US Troops.
The Democrat cuts to the US Military will create a national security crisis. The Democrats have been pushing to cut the military budget for my entire lifetime. The reason that they do this is, because they are trying to give our enemies an advantage before the next major conflict.
The US Military and the CIA were basket cases prior to the 9/11 attacks thanks to Bill Clinton. Clinton ‘allowed’ Bin Laden to escape several times and this is documented. So, when the Tea Party rookies and Libertarians shout that Bush spent too much, it was because Clinton gutted the National Defense in the years before 9/11. The enemy knew that the USA was vulnerable and they attacked before Bush could get ready.
A gutted US Military with Obama and Hagel in power will lead to a staged collapse of the US Economy and Military. Similar to the staged collapse of the USSR for the West to lower it’s guard to the Communist threat. I suspect that the US Military leaders are in on this, because they know that World Government is inevitable and they want to prevent a nuclear war.
The Democrats are purposely sabotaging National Security with the coming Military cuts to leave the American people vulnerable just like Clinton did pre-9/11. It will be the final knife in the back of Capitalism and freedom.
I find it very interesting that the Democrats want to drastically cut the Military defense budget and disarm the people. This will make the American people defenseless to any type of aggression or foreign invasion. Think it can’t happen? The Democrats are lowering the National Defense for a reason. The people are being set up.
Military cuts will open the door for a surrender to world communism. This surrender is planned…the Democrats are 100% on board with this.
It wouldn’t shock me if Obama made a deal with the Muslims to give them Jerusalem on a silver platter as a reward for breaking America’s bank with terrorism. Israel will be blamed in the media a lot the next year or two…be ready for that. Blaming Israel is nothing new, but I will get much worse.
Chuck Hagel will make a great Secretary of Defense for the Iranian military. He should send his resume to Ahmadinejad.
Arrest the Communists first and then talk to me about Rubio in 2016.

February 14, 2013

U.S. and EU Plan to Create ‘an Economic NATO’

February 14, 2013  •  From theTrumpet.com
America looks to Europe to stimulate its economy.

February 12, 2013

Revolution and Counter-Revolution Overview

Tradition in Action
La plus belle aventure du monde, c’est la nôtre
- The most beautiful adventure in the world is ours -

Atila Sinke Guimarăes

It is my opinion that the traditionalist movement in the United States is evolving into a more profound understanding of the evil it is facing. It is also realizing its own strength and its possibilities to stop the march of Progressivism in the Catholic Church. This deeper comprehension demands a consistent explanation of the phenomenon that caused the present day crisis in the Catholic Church and in Christendom.

Revolution and Counter-Revolution are terms that are being adopted by conservatives and traditionalists to describe such phenomenon. Even though often the word Revolution is correctly used, applications can lack the full extension the term implies. Let me give some examples.

Different uses of the word Revolution 

Some persons, and I include myself among them, had suggested the term Revolution to describe the subversion Vatican Council II caused in the previous order and stability of the Catholic Church. The expression “revolution” in relation to the Council has been utilized in the same sense even by the leaders of Progressivism such as Cardinal Congar and Cardinal Suenens (1). Therefore, it is appropriate to employ the word revolution to the post-Conciliar reforms. But in this application a few questions remain to be answered:

• If Vatican II is the Revolution, what is the Counter-Revolution? Is it Traditionalism? Is it the   conservative tendency among Catholics?
• Who can say that he or she is a real counter-revolutionary?
• What prepared the way for Vatican II? Was it a current, an articulated movement?
• If there was, in fact, something before Vatican II, can the term Revolution also refer to that?
One sees that this first application of Revolution and Counter-Revolution opens the door to a historic perspective that invites investigation.

February 9, 2013

Insider Warns: Conservative Websites Targeted, Staged US Economic Collapse…Part of an International Plan

Steve Cooper
This is something that is international in scope. The plan is international, and is dedicated to the dismantling or destruction of America. It’s happening right in front of us, but too few can actually see it. – Interview with anonymous insider
The Conservative Monster has already been targeted by the professional leftist bloggers that are mentioned in the interview with a supposed Homeland Security ‘Insider’.
  1. This article also warns about the staged economic collapse that I have warned about for many years. This is an international conspiracy.
  2. The ‘insider’ warns: People that are not prepared for the economic collapse, because they think it is all BS will be desperately seeking food and supplies when it does happen.
  3. Also, the insider warns about a false flag attack that will blame the Tea Party and Conservatives when the collapse does take place. This false flag will be used as a reason to install Martial Law.
  4. Now do you understand why they want to disarm the American people? No, most still don’t because they are brainwashed fools or just too dumbed down.
This staged economic collapse is similar to the staged economic collapse that was seen by the USSR for Americans to lower their guard about the Communist threat. Then, suddenly a new enemy emerges (Al Qaeda) on 9/11/01? I have a bridge to sell you…

February 8, 2013

Complete list of the Council of Europe's treaties (1949-2012)

No. Title Opening of the treaty Entry into force E.N.U.
001  Statute of the Council of Europe  5/5/1949  3/8/1949     
002  General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe  2/9/1949  10/9/1952     
005  Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms  4/11/1950  3/9/1953    X
009  Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms  20/3/1952  18/5/1954     
010  Protocol to the General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe  6/11/1952  11/7/1956     
012  European Interim Agreement on Social Security Schemes Relating to Old Age, Invalidity and Survivors  11/12/1953  1/7/1954  XX 
012A  Protocol to the European Interim Agreement on Social Security Schemes Relating to Old Age, Invalidity and Survivors  11/12/1953  1/10/1954  XX 
013  European Interim Agreement on Social Security other than Schemes for Old Age, Invalidity and Survivors  11/12/1953  1/7/1954  XX 
013A  Protocol to the European Interim Agreement on Social Security other than Schemes for Old Age, Invalidity and Survivors  11/12/1953  1/10/1954  XX 
014  European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance  11/12/1953  1/7/1954  XX 
014A  Protocol to the European Convention on Social and Medical Assistance  11/12/1953  1/7/1954  XX 
015  European Convention on the Equivalence of Diplomas leading to Admission to Universities  11/12/1953  20/4/1954  XX 
016  European Convention relating to the Formalities required for Patent Applications  11/12/1953  1/6/1955  XX 
017  European Convention on the International Classification of Patents for Inventions  19/12/1954  1/8/1955  XX 
018  European Cultural Convention  19/12/1954  5/5/1955  X  
019  European Convention on Establishment  13/12/1955  23/2/1965     
020  Agreement on the Exchange of War Cripples between Member Countries of the Council of Europe with a view to Medical Treatment  13/12/1955  1/1/1956  XX 
021  European Convention on the Equivalence of Periods of University Study  15/12/1956  18/9/1957  XX 
022  Second Protocol to the General Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Council of Europe  15/12/1956  15/12/1956     
023  European Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes  29/4/1957  30/4/1958  XX 
024  European Convention on Extradition  13/12/1957  18/4/1960  XX 
025  European Agreement on Regulations governing the Movement of Persons between Member States of the Council of Europe  13/12/1957  1/1/1958  XX 
026  European Agreement on the Exchange of Therapeutic Substances of Human Origin  

February 6, 2013

Obama and Global Establishment Warn U.K. not to Ditch EU

Facing a dramatic decline in support for his party due to its continued, albeit half-hearted, support for the controversial European Union, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron finally promised British subjects a referendum on whether or not to leave the EU — in five years. However, despite the tsunami of public opposition to the union, establishment figures from around the world, including the Obama administration, are using transparent fear-mongering tactics warning Britons to stick with the embattled super state or face dire consequences.

Still, with the liberty-minded U.K. Independence Party (UKIP) surging in opinion polls, thanks in large measure to its steadfast opposition to continued obedience to power-hungry “eurocrats” in Brussels, Cameron’s Conservative Party has taken a serious beating, putting its reelection prospects in jeopardy. Of course, many Conservative Party political leaders have long supported withdrawal from the EU, but until very recently, Prime Minister Cameron had waffled on the issue of letting the people decide for themselves.

Indeed, despite the grandstanding, Cameron, who had already suggested a referendum before he came to power but later backtracked, says he still supports U.K. membership in the union, asking only that some of the powers usurped by the EU be repatriated to London to avoid a so-called “Brexit” — a British exit from the union. In the face of overwhelming pressure from across the nation, and even within his own party, however, Cameron finally decided to announce that, if he is reelected, Britons will get to vote on continued membership. First, though, he plans to seek concessions from Brussels.

February 2, 2013


By Al Duncan
February 1, 2013

An excerpt from The Master Plan

“Prior financial dealings with the United States proved that America would not be penetrated easily. The original founders of the United States Constitution had masterfully erected individual, separate institutions to guard against an assault. These independent institutions made it difficult for an enemy to attach their mechanical linkages and frail bridges that were designed to weaken a country's structure and force its collapse. The only recourse was to directly confront the United States Constitution and dismantle it piece by piece.

“Through the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the road was paved for the United Nations (UN). It was through this United Nations organization that the Elite international bankers intended to conquer the world. This was Global Government and the start of the New World Order.

A huge campaign that spared no effort was orchestrated to misinform the American public regarding its direction and purpose. Senate opposition was rendered so impotent that there was no significant support against the enactment of the United Nations Charter. 

Subsequently, forty-two members of the United States delegation adopted the United Nations Charter.

The United States Congress then opened a bank account in the name of The United Nations. They authorized the State Department to make annual payments out of the United States Treasury for whatever amount the General Assembly of the UN felt necessary to cover its share of expenses.